From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PzElM-0008Nn-8C for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:53:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2EKpVxZ007084 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:31 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06965-02 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2EKpQMk007078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:26 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4D7E44D4.2020701@mentor.com> References: <629947F1-FA71-48CF-91BF-CBA98C302DFF@dominion.thruhere.net> <4D7E44D4.2020701@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1300135880.30423.571.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [RFC] Make GNU_HASH failures fatal X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:53:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:39 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On 03/14/2011 08:35 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > GNU_HASH QA failures are nearly gone in .dev, but still rampant in > > oe-core. I would like to propose making them fatal so they get fixed. > > The most worrysome offenders currently are gcc-runtime and perl. > > It's a little worse than that actually. Nothing is fatal currently. I > think we should grab warning/error > bit I did in oe.dev and pull that in (and then talk about adding RPATH > to the fatal list). I think there are "fatal" warnings in OECore in that the QA errors trigger non-zero exit codes. Warnings don't do that and GNU_HASH is a warning, RPATH is an error from what I remember... Cheers, Richard