From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Purdie, Richard" <richard.purdie@intel.com>,
"poky@yoctoproject.org" <poky@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: remove per-machine gtk+ FULL_OPTIMIZATION in favor of tune-atom.inc
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:19:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300335581.809.121.camel@elmorro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4549cf718c0d11feb618234956f45f22a0d1375b.1300334282.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 21:00 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>
> Now that the FULL_OPTIMIZATION for gtk+ has been enabled in the core
> tune-atom.inc, it is no longer necessary to do so for every atom based
> bsp.
>
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
> CC: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> CC: Ke Yu <ke.yu@intel.com>
> CC: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@intel.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.22.1.bb | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.22.1.bb b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.22.1.bb
> index ce1e03e..246606f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.22.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.22.1.bb
> @@ -37,10 +37,6 @@ LIBV = "2.10.0"
>
> PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "gtk-immodule-* gtk-printbackend-*"
>
> -#-fomit-frame-pointer in default FULL_OPTIMIZATION will cause matchbox-panel segfault on atom-pc & emenlow
> -FULL_OPTIMIZATION_emenlow = "-fexpensive-optimizations -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb -feliminate-unused-debug-types"
> -FULL_OPTIMIZATION_atom-pc = "-fexpensive-optimizations -frename-registers -O2 -ggdb -feliminate-unused-debug-types"
> -
> python populate_packages_prepend () {
> import os.path
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-17 4:00 [PATCH 0/1] Cleanup after atom-pc FULL_OPTIMIZATION fix for Bug 853 Darren Hart
2011-03-17 4:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: remove per-machine gtk+ FULL_OPTIMIZATION in favor of tune-atom.inc Darren Hart
2011-03-17 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-17 4:03 [PATCH 0/1][meta-intel] Cleanup following FULL_OPTIMIZATION fix for Bug Darren Hart
2011-03-17 4:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: remove per-machine gtk+ FULL_OPTIMIZATION in favor of tune-atom.inc Darren Hart
2011-03-17 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-03-17 4:44 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300335581.809.121.camel@elmorro \
--to=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.