From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0DSQ-0005rS-8E for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:41:42 +0100 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0DQm-0002wX-8z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:40:00 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1300365679-20067-2-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> References: <1300365679-20067-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <1300365679-20067-2-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:43:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1300369417.9054.5.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gst-plugins: define disjunctive PACKAGES_DYNAMIC for each pack base/good/bad/ugly X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:41:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:41 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * adds a bit more bits to keep in sync while changing gst-plugins > version, but not that much (this patch was mostly prepared by script) > * overlap in PACKAGES_DYNAMIC namespace causes notes like this in every build > NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime gst-plugin-autodetect (gst-plugins-bad, gst-plugins-good, gst-plugins-base, gst-plugins-ugly) > NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match gst-plugin-autodetect Do the overlapping PACKAGES_DYNAMICs have any ill effects apart from that diagnostic? If not, I'm not entirely convinced that the extra maintenance hassle of keeping those lists up to date for each release, even if it's partly/mostly scripted, is justified by the marginal benefit of silencing a NOTE. p.