From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf report: add sort by file lines
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:45:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301417155.3620.8.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301392457.4859.74.camel@twins>
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 17:54 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 17:32 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> >
> > Peter suggested to reverse map the reported IP (PEBS + fixup)
> > to a data access using dwarf info.
> > So I wrote this patch to see if the direction is right.
>
> I'm not sure this is quite the same thing, I'm not arguing this might
> not be useful, but this is not about data access.
>
> Suppose you have a line like:
>
> foo->bar->fubar = tmp->blah;
>
> There's 3 indirections there, a line number doesn't even get you close
> to knowing what data access triggered the event.
>
> struct bar {
> int poekoe[5];
> int fubar;
> };
>
> struct foo {
> long poekoe[3];
> struct bar *bar;
> };
>
> struct tmp {
> long poekoe[4];
> int blah;
> };
>
> void foo(struct foo *foo, struct tmp *tmp)
> {
> foo->bar->fubar = tmp->blah;
> }
>
> Which gives (somewhat simplified):
>
> foo:
> .cfi_startproc
> pushq %rbp
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> .cfi_offset 6, -16
> .cfi_def_cfa_register 6
> movq %rdi, -8(%rbp)
> movq %rsi, -16(%rbp)
> movq -8(%rbp), %rax /* load foo arg from stack */
> movq 24(%rax), %rax /* load foo->bar */
> movq -16(%rbp), %rdx /* load tmp arg from stack */
> movl 32(%rdx), %edx /* load tmp->blah */
> movl %edx, 20(%rax) /* store bar->fubar */
> leave
> ret
> .cfi_endproc
I need to have a close look at how dwarf cfi thing works.
>
> where I annotated the various moves with C comments.
>
> Now depending on what exact IP you get using PEBS+fixup you could using
> DWARF bits generate similar deductions from the code as I did in those
> comments and thus know exactly what data member was accessed and how
> (read/write).
Is it an unwind of the call frame stack to find out what data member was
accessed?
How to know the access type(read or write)?
>
> With that data you could then borrow some pahole code and annotate the
> various data structures to illustrate read/write distributions, which
> can then be used as input for data-reorder.
Could you explain a bit more about this?
Thanks,
Lin Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 9:32 [RFC PATCH] perf report: add sort by file lines Lin Ming
2011-03-29 9:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-03-29 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 16:45 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-03-29 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 17:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 17:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-03-30 1:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-03-30 2:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-03-31 6:57 ` Lin Ming
2011-04-01 10:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-03-31 8:45 ` Lin Ming
2011-03-31 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-03-31 14:19 ` Lin Ming
2011-03-31 15:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-03-31 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 14:34 ` Lin Ming
2011-03-31 14:51 ` Lin Ming
2011-03-31 16:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 13:02 ` Lin Ming
2011-04-01 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 10:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-01 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 13:22 ` Lin Ming
2011-04-01 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 13:57 ` Lin Ming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1301417155.3620.8.camel@localhost \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.