All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
To: ext Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
Cc: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>,
	Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"David.Woodhouse@intel.com" <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:16:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301674567.2789.117.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110401160940.GB21475@parrot.com>

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:09 +0200, ext Ivan Djelic wrote:
> I had a quick look at fsmc_nand.c, and I don't see anything in the controller
> preventing this approach. The driver provides an IO_ADDR_W address for sending
> data to the NAND device, and lets mtd upper layers do the job. By implementing
> the page writing function in the driver, one could clear the marker in the oob
> array before programming (and check it in the page reading function).

OK, cool!

> I would be very surprised if the controller did not allow control over oob
> contents other than ecc bytes. By doing so, it would prevent things like
> software bad block marking. But sometimes hardware can be very surprising :)

Well, I actually meant that programming OOB could be a separate
operation (not impossible): instead of "write data, oob data and ECC in
one go", something like "write data and oob, wait for completion, write
additional oob byte". So I meant that this could have write speed
impact. But this does not matter, since this is not the case now.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

      reply	other threads:[~2011-04-01 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  6:10 [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround Viresh Kumar
2011-02-24  9:38 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 10:20   ` Vipin Kumar
2011-02-24 11:10     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 11:36       ` Vipin Kumar
2011-03-22  4:36 ` viresh kumar
2011-03-31 13:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  6:28   ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  6:51     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  8:33       ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  8:39         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  9:06           ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  9:42             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:14             ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 13:04               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:04                 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:16                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:49                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:58                       ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-04-01 15:46                         ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:09                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:16                       ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301674567.2789.117.camel@localhost \
    --to=artem.bityutskiy@nokia.com \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.