All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: "arethe.rtai" <arethe.rtai@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-core <Xenomai-core@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Would Xenomai adopt RTL after the patent is expired?
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:57:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302073044.2030.19.camel@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104060918575625047@domain.hid>

On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:19 +0800, arethe.rtai wrote:
> HI:
>    The patents that cover RT-Linux are set to expire in a few years,
> then, would Xenomai adopt the RTL technology? As known, the RTL idea
> is clean and minimalistic, it may improve the determinism of Xenomai.

The trend is rather to blur the distinction between native real-time and
dual kernel approaches these days, not to downgrade to a kernel-only
interrupt handler with co-routines on top.

So no, there would be no rational reason to do that, not to mention the
fact that if we can assess the typical latency of Xenomai over the seven
architectures it runs on with the latest mainline kernels, we would be
unable to compare this to anything else than x86 over a legacy kernel
AFAIK. And no, I don't think that I'm going to send an inquiry to WRS
for information regarding how RTL performs on other architectures.
Incidentally, maybe you should ask yourself why they ship WR-Linux with
PREEMPT_RT.

> Regards arethe
> 2011-04-06 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> arethe.rtai 
> _______________________________________________
> Xenomai-core mailing list
> Xenomai-core@domain.hid
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

-- 
Philippe.




      reply	other threads:[~2011-04-06  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-06  1:19 [Xenomai-core] Would Xenomai adopt RTL after the patent is expired? arethe.rtai
2011-04-06  6:57 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302073044.2030.19.camel@domain.hid \
    --to=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=Xenomai-core@domain.hid \
    --cc=arethe.rtai@domain.hid \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.