From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03484C80A78 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:21:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p38DLXGR007279; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:21:33 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07176-02; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:21:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p38DLLbR007273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:21:23 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Joshua Lock In-Reply-To: <1302265737.7724.1.camel@scimitar> References: <8d834327e2d84b8d4ad72b9c617d261ab8b206e2.1301664697.git.josh@linux.intel.com> <1301957183.24596.414.camel@rex> <1302088591.2355.7.camel@scimitar> <1302265737.7724.1.camel@scimitar> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:21:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1302268878.22904.125.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] elfutils: fix builds with gcc 4.6 X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:21:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:28 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > I've worked up an alternative fix and sent a pull request to oe-core. I > > > took the approach of consolidating several patches from the upstream > > > source repository which remove the unused variables. > > > > > > I consolidated them into a single patch so that they are easier to drop > > > once we update elfutils to 0.152 or higher. > > > > > > > Why not update to 0.152 then > > The patch series is intended for a Bernard point release, the Bernard > release is already out with eflutils 0.148. I think this is a good approach given the issues we know we're going to have with Bernard. I'll obviously take a version upgrade patch too :) Cheers, Richard