All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add a new file op for fsync to give fs's more control
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:34:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302896032-sup-86@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110415192412.GA17974@infradead.org>

Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-15 15:24:12 -0400:
> Sorry, but this is too ugly to live.  If the reason for this really is
> good enough we'll just need to push the filemap_write_and_wait_range
> and i_mutex locking into every ->fsync instance.
> 

Which part is too ugly to live?  The special op? New parameters?

The unconditional taking of i_mutex hurts a lot, especially on directory
fsyncs, so I'd love to get rid of it.

-chris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-15 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-15 19:09 [RFC] Add a new file op for fsync to give fs's more control Josef Bacik
2011-04-15 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: add a ->fsync_nolock file op Josef Bacik
2011-04-15 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: switch to the ->fsync_nolock helper Josef Bacik
2011-04-15 19:24 ` [RFC] Add a new file op for fsync to give fs's more control Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 19:32   ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-18  6:49     ` liubo
2011-04-18 14:10       ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-18 14:30       ` Chris Mason
2011-04-15 19:34   ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-04-15 19:49     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302896032-sup-86@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.