From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@parallels.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"asias.hejun@gmail.com" <asias.hejun@gmail.com>,
"gorcunov@gmail.com" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] kvm tools: Add scatter-gather variants of IO functions
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:22:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303035738.3017.5.camel@stimpy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAABAF2.1020700@parallels.com>
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 14:03 +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > What if nr is nonzero when the loop terminates? You need to update the
> > first iovec entry so you don't redo that segment.
>
> Oh yes, it is simple (hunk above), so "const" from prototype must be removed,
> while original syscalls declare iov argument as const.
The problem here is that if we start changing the internals of the iovec
struct it forces us to copy it before calling the I/O functions since if
we change it within the functions it's unusable to the caller anymore.
Currently it's passed as a const because we only move pointers outside
the struct.
Basically the trade-off here is copying iovec before every read/write vs
having to sometimes read data again (< 1 block), so I've went with the
latter.
Do you think it's better to go with the first alternative?
--
Sasha.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-17 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-16 15:05 [PATCH 1/2 V2] kvm tools: Add scatter-gather variants of IO functions Sasha Levin
2011-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] kvm tools: Add scatter-gather support for disk images Sasha Levin
2011-04-16 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2 V2] kvm tools: Add scatter-gather variants of IO functions Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-04-16 20:33 ` Sasha Levin
2011-04-17 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-17 10:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-04-17 10:22 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2011-04-17 10:34 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-04-17 11:11 ` Sasha Levin
2011-04-17 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303035738.3017.5.camel@stimpy \
--to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@parallels.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.