From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QHx3A-0001EO-Vb for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:48:57 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p45BkHgK010530; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:17 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10496-01; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p45Bk9p4010524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:10 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <201105041621.25113.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> References: <4DC16BA5.1090508@mlbassoc.com> <201105041621.25113.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 12:46:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1304595968.20791.26.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 1/3] Remove machine-specific metadata for machines no longer in oe-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:48:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:21 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 04 May 2011 16:07:17 Gary Thomas wrote: > > Perhaps it makes sense to always package netbase in ${MACHINE_ARCH} since > > it almost always will have machine specific data? > > I'll let someone else comment on this, I don't have a hard opinion either way. Since the exception machines are clearly listed I think its fine as it stands at the moment. If we start getting lots of overrides there we can rethink it though. Lets see how it goes... Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A324C810B8 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:46:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p45BkHgK010530; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:17 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10496-01; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p45Bk9p4010524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:10 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <201105041621.25113.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> References: <4DC16BA5.1090508@mlbassoc.com> <201105041621.25113.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 12:46:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1304595968.20791.26.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] Remove machine-specific metadata for machines no longer in oe-core X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:46:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:21 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 04 May 2011 16:07:17 Gary Thomas wrote: > > Perhaps it makes sense to always package netbase in ${MACHINE_ARCH} since > > it almost always will have machine specific data? > > I'll let someone else comment on this, I don't have a hard opinion either way. Since the exception machines are clearly listed I think its fine as it stands at the moment. If we start getting lots of overrides there we can rethink it though. Lets see how it goes... Cheers, Richard