From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.3.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p49JLNCs003697 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 15:21:25 -0400 Received: from fep07-svc.tim.it (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msux-gh1-uea01.nsa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p49JLNAa002869 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 19:21:24 GMT Subject: Re: Patch Review Process From: Guido Trentalancia To: Steve Lawrence Cc: SELinux Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 21:21:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4DC804D8.1080605@tresys.com> References: <4DC804D8.1080605@tresys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <1304968880.2521.43.camel@vortex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hello Steve ! On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:14 -0400, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Recently, I've not been merging patches at the rate that I would like. > The delay is a problem itself, but it has also meant that people aren't > certain of the status of the patches that have been submitted. > [cut] > > Finally, if anyone has any suggestions on ways to make the patch review > process better, my ears are all open. Yes, adding at least the name and/or email address of the submitter to the "Current Patch Queue" will probably help. Regards, Guido -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.