From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] iwlagn: use cts-to-self protection on 5000 adapters series
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:54:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305215656.15845.1.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305213922-2516-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:25 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> This patch fixes 802.11n performance regression I have since 2.6.35. It
> boost performance on my 5GHz N-only network from about 5MB/s to 8MB/s.
> Similar percentage boost can be observed on 2.4 GHz.
>
> These are results test 5x downloading of approximately 700MB iso image
> on wreless-testing kernel:
>
> vanilla: 5.27 5.22 4.94 4.47 5.31 ; avr 5.0420 std 0.35110
> patched: 8.07 7.95 8.06 7.99 7.96 ; avr 8.0060 std 0.055946
>
> This was achieved with NetworkManager configured to do not perform
> periodical scans, by configuring constant BSSID. With periodical scans,
> after some time, performance downgrade to unpached driver level, like
> in example below:
>
> patched: 7.40 7.61 4.28 4.37 4.80 avr 5.6920 std 1.6683
>
> However patch still make better here, since similar test on unpached
> driver make link disconnects with below messages after some time:
>
> wlan1: authenticate with 00:23:69:35:d1:3f (try 1)
> wlan1: authenticate with 00:23:69:35:d1:3f (try 2)
> wlan1: authenticate with 00:23:69:35:d1:3f (try 3)
> wlan1: authentication with 00:23:69:35:d1:3f timed out
>
> I think patch also helps with
>
> iwlagn 0000:20:00.0: queue 10 stuck 3 time. Fw reload.
> iwlagn 0000:20:00.0: On demand firmware reload
> iwlagn 0000:20:00.0: Stopping AGG while state not ON or starting
>
> on 2.6.35 kernel, that I can see happens randomly on that version, but
> I'm not 100% sure about that.
>
> This is partial revert of:
>
> commit 94597ab23ea10b3bdcba534be00a9f7b35791c07
> Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> Date: Mon Aug 9 10:57:02 2010 -0700
>
> iwlagn: fix rts cts protection
>
> so I'm not sure if patch does not broke things, which that
> commit fixes.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c | 1 -
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-hcmd.c | 12 ++----------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rxon.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> index 98f81df..06949c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,6 @@ static struct iwl_base_params iwl5000_base_params = {
> };
> static struct iwl_ht_params iwl5000_ht_params = {
> .ht_greenfield_support = true,
> - .use_rts_for_aggregation = true, /* use rts/cts protection */
> };
>
> #define IWL_DEVICE_5000 \
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-hcmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-hcmd.c
> index b12c72d..23fa93d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-hcmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-hcmd.c
> @@ -163,17 +163,9 @@ static void iwlagn_tx_cmd_protection(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> __le16 fc, __le32 *tx_flags)
> {
> if (info->control.rates[0].flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_RTS_CTS ||
> - info->control.rates[0].flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_CTS_PROTECT) {
> + info->control.rates[0].flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_CTS_PROTECT ||
> + info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU)
> *tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_PROT_REQUIRE_MSK;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (priv->cfg->ht_params &&
> - priv->cfg->ht_params->use_rts_for_aggregation &&
> - info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) {
> - *tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_PROT_REQUIRE_MSK;
> - return;
> - }
> }
>
> /* Calc max signal level (dBm) among 3 possible receivers */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rxon.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rxon.c
> index 0238743..96a5832 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rxon.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rxon.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,14 @@ int iwlagn_commit_rxon(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx)
> return 0;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * force CTS-to-self frames protection if RTS-CTS is not preffered
Spelling nit: "preferred"
> + * one aggregation protection method
> + */
> + if (!(priv->cfg->ht_params &&
> + priv->cfg->ht_params->use_rts_for_aggregation))
> + ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN;
> +
> if ((ctx->vif && ctx->vif->bss_conf.use_short_slot) ||
> !(ctx->staging.flags & RXON_FLG_BAND_24G_MSK))
> ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SHORT_SLOT_MSK;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 15:25 [RFC/RFT] iwlagn: use cts-to-self protection on 5000 adapters series Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-05-12 15:54 ` Dan Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305215656.15845.1.camel@dcbw.foobar.com \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.