From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:48:10 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306131809.11085920.1505393290137.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd971aa4-e4e3-78f0-59dd-44e8c4a212a0@redhat.com>
----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
|
|
| On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu.owa at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to
| > fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel.
| > We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine.
| >
| > Patch number 01/02/03 were posted on this mailing list.
| > However, I've modifed 03 to correct a bug that aquires rwlock multiple
| > times.
| > Other than that, there is no changes.
| >
| > 01:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00021.html
| > 02:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-August/msg00076.html
| > 03:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00023.html
| >
| > thanks in advance.
| > -- owa
| >
| >
|
| Many thanks for sending the updated patches. Since the merge window is
| currently open, we are at a good point to look at these, since there is
| maximum time before the next merge window. Perhaps one way to deal with
| these patches would be to take the ones that we are most confident in
| now (of course that could be all of them!) and postpone any that we
| think might need more review until later. That way it should be easier
| to review the more complicated patches and we get the benefit of the
| easier to review patches sooner.
|
| Dave, Bob, does that make sense?
|
| Steve.
Hi,
Yes, sounds okay to me.
Bob Peterson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 8:54 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review tsutomu.owa
2017-09-13 9:51 ` Steven Whitehouse
2017-09-13 16:18 ` David Teigland
2017-09-18 20:20 ` David Teigland
2017-09-14 12:48 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2017-09-14 12:47 ` Bob Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306131809.11085920.1505393290137.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.