From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmapi
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306283489.2823.94.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110511150712.222802741@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:04 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> plain text document attachment (xfs-fix-ep-access-2)
> Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the extent index
> when moving on to the next index in xfs_bmapi.
>
> Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-11 15:04 [PATCH 0/9] extent buffer indexing fixes Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: remove the unused XFS_BMAPI_RSVBLOCKS flag Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-20 20:17 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove if_lastex Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-20 20:17 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-23 8:52 ` [PATCH 2/9 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-25 1:14 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: correctly decrement the extent buffer index in xfs_bmap_del_extent Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 6:50 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-12 6:54 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-12 7:17 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:27 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmap_add_extent_* Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:31 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:30 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmapi Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:20 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:22 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: do not do pointer arithmetics on extent records Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:23 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: fix up asserts in xfs_iflush_fork Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:24 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: check for valid indices in xfs_iext_get_ext and xfs_iext_idx_to_irec Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:32 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306283489.2823.94.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.