From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E954C80335 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 04:49:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4Q9naok011495; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:49:36 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10928-06; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:49:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4Q9nTda011486 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 May 2011 10:49:30 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa In-Reply-To: <20110526073937.GL3222@jama.jama.net> References: <4DDDAA38.8070404@gmail.com> <1306381066.22553.52.camel@elmorro> <20110526073937.GL3222@jama.jama.net> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:49:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1306403365.27470.99.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: "dvhart@linux.intel.com" , Yocto Mailer Subject: Re: In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:49:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:39 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Using machine override has one small benefit > > when I have meta-nokia layer which has only recipes with > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "nokia900" and I'm building different machine (like > om-gta02) I get this warning: > WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_nokia-layer '^/OE/shr-core/meta-smartphone/meta-nokia/' > because all bb files from this layer are ignored because of > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE I think there is a change on bitbake master which should fix some of the cases where this warning was appearing (where a layer only contained .bbappend files). > if I change it like this > -BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "nokia-layer" > +BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_nokia900 += "nokia-layer" > maybe with more overrides per layer.conf if it supports multiple > machines, the warning is gone, but seems like sstate checksums are > different again, because during test I changed only this and another gcc > rebuild is in runqueue now :/. Ouch. If you can figure out what changed we can try and fix that. FWIW, I also merged the signature generation data writing at stamp creation time (with fixes). Cheers, Richard