From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tanu Kaskinen Subject: Negative volume steps? Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:06:43 +0300 Message-ID: <1306408004.4306.53.camel@jarl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-gw2.cc.tut.fi (mail-gw2.cc.tut.fi [130.230.160.16]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9A103AE5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 13:06:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [91.153.205.9] (a91-153-205-9.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.153.205.9]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cc.tut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDCDA409E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:06:46 +0300 (EEST) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi, If a driver claims that the lowest volume step (integer step, not dB) of a volume element is -126 and the highest step is 0, is the driver broken? I'm asking, because apparently there are such drivers, but Pulseaudio currently assumes that the volume steps are never negative. -- Tanu