All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 00:13:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306509182.1351.1.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=8jQPdBNJYfM=geuXFsAXJJgfq=Q@mail.gmail.com>

2011-05-27 (금), 09:57 -0400, Mike Snitzer:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:11:22PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> Since BARRIER requests have been converted to FLUSH/FUA, it would be
> >> better for blktrace to recognize FLUSH requests as BARRIER for the
> >> backward-compatibility IMHO.
> >
> > I'd rather see new flags for them.  F and U maybe?
> 
> Somehow I'm not surprised by your F and U suggestion -- appropriate on
> multiple levels :)

OK. I'll work on that direction.
Thanks.


-- 
Regards,
Namhyung Kim



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-27 13:11 [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier Namhyung Kim
2011-05-27 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: add REQ_SECURE to REQ_COMMON_MASK Namhyung Kim
2011-05-27 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-27 13:57   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-05-27 15:13     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2011-05-27 20:17       ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-28  2:09           ` Namhyung Kim
2011-05-28  7:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-31 10:27               ` Namhyung Kim
2011-05-31 10:37             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306509182.1351.1.camel@leonhard \
    --to=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.