From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] license.bbclass parsing changes and common-license additions
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:29:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306517344.27470.300.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDD90F9.5030901@intel.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 16:30 -0700, Elizabeth Flanagan wrote:
> This pull request is a consolidated pull of some changes to the license.bbclass
> license parsing, some cleanup of existing licenses, and some additions to/
> modifications of various licenses kept in meta/files/common-licenses.
>
> I've modified the common-licenses by adding licenses from the Software Package
> and Data Exchange group/OSI and using their naming convention for internal
> parsing within license.bbclass.
>
> Licenses were retrieved from http://spdx.org/licenses/ or
> in cases where text of the license was missing:
> http://opensource.linux-mirror.org/licenses/
>
> I've also modified some recipe's LICENSE field, either because the field was
> unparsable or the LICENSE was factually incorrect. This was not an entire audit
> of every LICENSE field but there were some errors that were obvious.
>
> And lastly, using python abstract syntax trees as a parser and an ast visitor
> class, I've begun the first steps to being able to put some sanity to license
> selection.
>
> One note. License modifiers have traditionally been limited to the "or greater"
> modifier "+". I've added another modifier "with exceptions" for licenses that
> have no generic ie common-licenses/GPL-2,0-with-GCC-exception
>
> The modifiers are ignored for now, but I'll be looking at the logic for them
> next.
>
> One side note. The listserve seems to limit mail size, so some of these PATCH
> requests may get slammed to /dev/null.
>
> The following changes since commit 5d56586a00350f2ec90a7143182a3f1294fb4c73:
>
> binutils: Add missing dependency on zlib-native (2011-05-25 23:53:47 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib eflanagan/common-licenses
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=eflanagan/common-licenses
>
> Beth Flanagan (5):
> common-licenses: Adding new licenses and renaming
> License Field Cleanup: Non-standard field names
I took these two big ones before anything changed and we started seeing
rejects.
> license.bbclass: Sane Parsing of licenses
> license.bbclass: Fixing X-MIT SPDX license mapping
> license.bbclass: Fixing LICENSE modifiers.
For these, Josh spotted some debug left in and I think you can squash
these into one commit.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 23:30 [PATCH 0/5] license.bbclass parsing changes and common-license additions Elizabeth Flanagan
2011-05-26 21:30 ` Joshua Lock
2011-05-27 17:29 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306517344.27470.300.camel@rex \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.