From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284034C80889 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:37:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2011 15:37:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,283,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="6041087" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.115]) ([10.255.12.115]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2011 15:37:17 -0700 From: Tom Zanussi To: Jeremy Puhlman In-Reply-To: <4DE0234A.2070808@gmail.com> References: <4DE01DD3.80506@linux.intel.com> <1306533682.23639.18.camel@elmorro> <4DE0234A.2070808@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:36:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1306535787.23639.25.camel@elmorro> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: fix BBFILE_COLLECTIONS overrides X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:37:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 15:18 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote: > > The crownbay has two BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in the same file, one for > > crownbay and one for crownbay-noemgd. The conditional append allows > > them to be selected based on the machine selected. > > The BBFILE_COLLECTIONS var basically give you a hook so you can find: > > BBFILE_PATTERN_ > BBFILE_PRIORITY_ > > > While it certainly is true you could have different sets, for different > machines, you set those subsequent values identically. At the moment > there appears to be no need unless your using the value in some other > manner else where. FWIW it probably doesn't matter either way, but it > doesn't appear to be needed by the way you are configuring it. > Yeah, you're right - it probably isn't necessary, though not broken either. Another thing to put on my list of cleanups for meta-intel that I never seem to get to... Thanks for your comments, Tom > Jeremy Puhlman > Montavista Sofware, LLC. >