From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] UBIFS: fix shrinker object count reports
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:06:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307113619.3069.14.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307111413.3069.5.camel@localhost>
So,
>From cf610bf4199770420629d3bc273494bd27ad6c1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:03:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] UBIFS: fix shrinker object count reports
Sometimes VM asks the shrinker to return amount of objects it can shrink,
and we return the ubifs_clean_zn_cnt in that case. However, it is possible
that this counter is negative for a short period of time, due to the way
UBIFS TNC code updates it. And I can observe the following warnings sometimes:
shrink_slab: ubifs_shrinker+0x0/0x2b7 [ubifs] negative objects to delete nr=-8541616642706119788
This patch makes sure UBIFS never returns negative count of objects.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
fs/ubifs/shrinker.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/shrinker.c b/fs/ubifs/shrinker.c
index ca953a9..9e1d056 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/shrinker.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/shrinker.c
@@ -284,7 +284,11 @@ int ubifs_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
long clean_zn_cnt = atomic_long_read(&ubifs_clean_zn_cnt);
if (nr == 0)
- return clean_zn_cnt;
+ /*
+ * Due to the way UBIFS updates the clean znode counter it may
+ * temporarily be negative.
+ */
+ return clean_zn_cnt >= 0 ? clean_zn_cnt : 1;
if (!clean_zn_cnt) {
/*
--
1.7.2.3
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-03 13:49 [PATCH 00/10] UBIFS: for Linux 3.0 Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] UBIFS: supress false error messages Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] UBIFS: introduce a "grouped" journal head flag Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] UBIFS: amend ubifs_recover_leb interface Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] UBIFS: fix recovery broken by the previous recovery fix Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] UBIFS: fix shrinker object count reports Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 14:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 15:06 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] UBIFS: fix memory leak on error path Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] UBIFS: fix clean znode counter corruption in error cases Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] UBIFS: assert no fixup when writing a node Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] UBIFS: intialize LPT earlier Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-03 13:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] UBIFS: fix-up free space earlier Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307113619.3069.14.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.