From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com, Tim.Deegan@citrix.com,
jbeulich@novell.com, snanda@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:00:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307138409.14598.52.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603144540.d182c231.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But the whole thing is a bit weird. Does this look better?
> Make these messages more gramatically pleasing, more consistent and remove
> strange ellipses.
or maybe something like this:
init/calibrate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/calibrate.c b/init/calibrate.c
index cfd7000..827a45c 100644
--- a/init/calibrate.c
+++ b/init/calibrate.c
@@ -246,32 +246,38 @@ recalibrate:
return lpj;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_loops_per_jiffy) = { 0 };
+
void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
{
+ int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
static bool printed;
+ const char *msg;
- if (preset_lpj) {
+ if (per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu)) {
+ loops_per_jiffy = per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu);
+ msg = " CPU previously calibrated";
+ } else if (preset_lpj) {
loops_per_jiffy = preset_lpj;
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
- "preset value.. ");
+ msg = " preset value";
} else if ((!printed) && lpj_fine) {
loops_per_jiffy = lpj_fine;
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
- "value calculated using timer frequency.. ");
+ msg = " using timer frequency";
} else if ((loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_direct()) != 0) {
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay using timer "
- "specific routine.. ");
+ msg = " using timer specific routine";
} else {
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
+ pr_info("Calibrating delay loop...\n");
loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_converge();
+ per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu) = loops_per_jiffy;
+ msg = "";
}
- if (!printed)
- pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
+
+ if (!printed) {
+ pr_info("Delay loop calibration:%s %lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
+ msg,
loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
(loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100, loops_per_jiffy);
- printed = true;
+ printed = true;
+ }
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 23:19 [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done Sameer Nanda
2011-06-03 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 21:08 ` David Daney
2011-06-03 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 22:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2011-06-03 22:15 ` Sameer Nanda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307138409.14598.52.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
--cc=snanda@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.