From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: small RPS cache for fragments?
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:06:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307383579.8149.2753.camel@tardy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307380513.3098.76.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:15 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 10:08 -0700, Rick Jones a écrit :
>
> > Mode-rr bonding reorders TCP segments all the time.
>
> Shouldnt TCP frames have DF bit set ?
I was ass-u-me-ing that when talking about TCP, David was speaking
generally about TCP segments, and suggesting that were bonding's mode-rr
altered to not re-order TCP segments, a similar technique
could/would/should avoid re-ordering IP datagram fragments, regardless
of their payload.
Jay will have to weigh-in on how difficult that would be, I'm guessing
it would mean a fair bit of overhead to mode-rr though, to know the
completion status of frames from the same flow and/or the depth of the
tx queues etc etc. I thought that one of mode-rr's (few IMO, just check
the archives where I've complained about it :) redeeming qualities was
its minimal overhead.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 18:33 small RPS cache for fragments? David Miller
2011-05-17 20:02 ` Tom Herbert
2011-05-17 20:17 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-17 20:41 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-17 20:49 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 21:10 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 21:13 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-17 21:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-17 21:26 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 21:40 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-17 21:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 21:11 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-17 21:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-17 21:27 ` Tom Herbert
2011-05-17 21:28 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 23:59 ` Changli Gao
2011-05-18 6:37 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 20:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 20:47 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 21:44 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 21:44 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 21:50 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 22:42 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-24 20:01 ` David Miller
2011-05-24 21:38 ` Rick Jones
2011-06-04 20:29 ` David Miller
2011-06-06 17:08 ` Rick Jones
2011-06-06 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 18:06 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2011-06-06 19:23 ` David Miller
2011-06-06 19:22 ` David Miller
2011-06-06 20:05 ` Rick Jones
2011-06-06 21:06 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-06-06 21:40 ` David Miller
2011-06-06 22:49 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307383579.8149.2753.camel@tardy \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.