From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
o.hartmann@telovital.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Mark Einon <Mark.Einon@gmail.com>,
Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] staging: et131x: et1310_rx.c checkpatch fixes
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:06:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307383624-8740-3-git-send-email-mark.einon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307383624-8740-1-git-send-email-mark.einon@gmail.com>
From: Mark Einon <Mark.Einon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c
index fc6bd43..cd72a0b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c
@@ -88,7 +88,23 @@
#include "et1310_rx.h"
#include "et131x.h"
-void nic_return_rfd(struct et131x_adapter *etdev, struct rfd *rfd);
+static inline u32 bump_fbr(u32 *fbr, u32 limit)
+{
+ u32 v = *fbr;
+ v++;
+ /* This works for all cases where limit < 1024. The 1023 case
+ works because 1023++ is 1024 which means the if condition is not
+ taken but the carry of the bit into the wrap bit toggles the wrap
+ value correctly */
+ if ((v & ET_DMA10_MASK) > limit) {
+ v &= ~ET_DMA10_MASK;
+ v ^= ET_DMA10_WRAP;
+ }
+ /* For the 1023 case */
+ v &= (ET_DMA10_MASK|ET_DMA10_WRAP);
+ *fbr = v;
+ return v;
+}
/**
* et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc
@@ -246,7 +262,7 @@ int et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
&rx_ring->Fbr1MemPa[i]);
if (!rx_ring->Fbr1MemVa[i]) {
- dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
+ dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
"Could not alloc memory\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -491,7 +507,7 @@ void et131x_rx_dma_memory_free(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
/* Free Packet Status Ring */
if (rx_ring->pPSRingVa) {
pktStatRingSize =
- sizeof(struct pkt_stat_desc) * adapter->rx_ring.PsrNumEntries;
+ sizeof(struct pkt_stat_desc) * adapter->rx_ring.PsrNumEntries;
pci_free_consistent(adapter->pdev, pktStatRingSize,
rx_ring->pPSRingVa, rx_ring->pPSRingPa);
@@ -708,6 +724,82 @@ void SetRxDmaTimer(struct et131x_adapter *etdev)
}
/**
+ * NICReturnRFD - Recycle a RFD and put it back onto the receive list
+ * @etdev: pointer to our adapter
+ * @rfd: pointer to the RFD
+ */
+void nic_return_rfd(struct et131x_adapter *etdev, struct rfd *rfd)
+{
+ struct rx_ring *rx_local = &etdev->rx_ring;
+ struct rxdma_regs __iomem *rx_dma = &etdev->regs->rxdma;
+ u16 bi = rfd->bufferindex;
+ u8 ri = rfd->ringindex;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* We don't use any of the OOB data besides status. Otherwise, we
+ * need to clean up OOB data
+ */
+ if (
+#ifdef USE_FBR0
+ (ri == 0 && bi < rx_local->Fbr0NumEntries) ||
+#endif
+ (ri == 1 && bi < rx_local->Fbr1NumEntries)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&etdev->FbrLock, flags);
+
+ if (ri == 1) {
+ struct fbr_desc *next =
+ (struct fbr_desc *) (rx_local->pFbr1RingVa) +
+ INDEX10(rx_local->local_Fbr1_full);
+
+ /* Handle the Free Buffer Ring advancement here. Write
+ * the PA / Buffer Index for the returned buffer into
+ * the oldest (next to be freed)FBR entry
+ */
+ next->addr_hi = rx_local->fbr[1]->bus_high[bi];
+ next->addr_lo = rx_local->fbr[1]->bus_low[bi];
+ next->word2 = bi;
+
+ writel(bump_fbr(&rx_local->local_Fbr1_full,
+ rx_local->Fbr1NumEntries - 1),
+ &rx_dma->fbr1_full_offset);
+ }
+#ifdef USE_FBR0
+ else {
+ struct fbr_desc *next = (struct fbr_desc *)
+ rx_local->pFbr0RingVa +
+ INDEX10(rx_local->local_Fbr0_full);
+
+ /* Handle the Free Buffer Ring advancement here. Write
+ * the PA / Buffer Index for the returned buffer into
+ * the oldest (next to be freed) FBR entry
+ */
+ next->addr_hi = rx_local->fbr[0]->bus_high[bi];
+ next->addr_lo = rx_local->fbr[0]->bus_low[bi];
+ next->word2 = bi;
+
+ writel(bump_fbr(&rx_local->local_Fbr0_full,
+ rx_local->Fbr0NumEntries - 1),
+ &rx_dma->fbr0_full_offset);
+ }
+#endif
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&etdev->FbrLock, flags);
+ } else {
+ dev_err(&etdev->pdev->dev,
+ "NICReturnRFD illegal Buffer Index returned\n");
+ }
+
+ /* The processing on this RFD is done, so put it back on the tail of
+ * our list
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&etdev->rcv_lock, flags);
+ list_add_tail(&rfd->list_node, &rx_local->RecvList);
+ rx_local->nReadyRecv++;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&etdev->rcv_lock, flags);
+
+ WARN_ON(rx_local->nReadyRecv > rx_local->NumRfd);
+}
+
+/**
* et131x_rx_dma_disable - Stop of Rx_DMA on the ET1310
* @etdev: pointer to our adapter structure
*/
@@ -776,7 +868,7 @@ void et131x_rx_dma_enable(struct et131x_adapter *etdev)
* the packet to it, puts the RFD in the RecvPendList, and also returns
* the pointer to the RFD.
*/
-struct rfd * nic_rx_pkts(struct et131x_adapter *etdev)
+struct rfd *nic_rx_pkts(struct et131x_adapter *etdev)
{
struct rx_ring *rx_local = &etdev->rx_ring;
struct rx_status_block *status;
@@ -1059,96 +1151,3 @@ void et131x_handle_recv_interrupt(struct et131x_adapter *etdev)
etdev->rx_ring.UnfinishedReceives = false;
}
-static inline u32 bump_fbr(u32 *fbr, u32 limit)
-{
- u32 v = *fbr;
- v++;
- /* This works for all cases where limit < 1024. The 1023 case
- works because 1023++ is 1024 which means the if condition is not
- taken but the carry of the bit into the wrap bit toggles the wrap
- value correctly */
- if ((v & ET_DMA10_MASK) > limit) {
- v &= ~ET_DMA10_MASK;
- v ^= ET_DMA10_WRAP;
- }
- /* For the 1023 case */
- v &= (ET_DMA10_MASK|ET_DMA10_WRAP);
- *fbr = v;
- return v;
-}
-
-/**
- * NICReturnRFD - Recycle a RFD and put it back onto the receive list
- * @etdev: pointer to our adapter
- * @rfd: pointer to the RFD
- */
-void nic_return_rfd(struct et131x_adapter *etdev, struct rfd *rfd)
-{
- struct rx_ring *rx_local = &etdev->rx_ring;
- struct rxdma_regs __iomem *rx_dma = &etdev->regs->rxdma;
- u16 bi = rfd->bufferindex;
- u8 ri = rfd->ringindex;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /* We don't use any of the OOB data besides status. Otherwise, we
- * need to clean up OOB data
- */
- if (
-#ifdef USE_FBR0
- (ri == 0 && bi < rx_local->Fbr0NumEntries) ||
-#endif
- (ri == 1 && bi < rx_local->Fbr1NumEntries)) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&etdev->FbrLock, flags);
-
- if (ri == 1) {
- struct fbr_desc *next =
- (struct fbr_desc *) (rx_local->pFbr1RingVa) +
- INDEX10(rx_local->local_Fbr1_full);
-
- /* Handle the Free Buffer Ring advancement here. Write
- * the PA / Buffer Index for the returned buffer into
- * the oldest (next to be freed)FBR entry
- */
- next->addr_hi = rx_local->fbr[1]->bus_high[bi];
- next->addr_lo = rx_local->fbr[1]->bus_low[bi];
- next->word2 = bi;
-
- writel(bump_fbr(&rx_local->local_Fbr1_full,
- rx_local->Fbr1NumEntries - 1),
- &rx_dma->fbr1_full_offset);
- }
-#ifdef USE_FBR0
- else {
- struct fbr_desc *next = (struct fbr_desc *)
- rx_local->pFbr0RingVa +
- INDEX10(rx_local->local_Fbr0_full);
-
- /* Handle the Free Buffer Ring advancement here. Write
- * the PA / Buffer Index for the returned buffer into
- * the oldest (next to be freed) FBR entry
- */
- next->addr_hi = rx_local->fbr[0]->bus_high[bi];
- next->addr_lo = rx_local->fbr[0]->bus_low[bi];
- next->word2 = bi;
-
- writel(bump_fbr(&rx_local->local_Fbr0_full,
- rx_local->Fbr0NumEntries - 1),
- &rx_dma->fbr0_full_offset);
- }
-#endif
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&etdev->FbrLock, flags);
- } else {
- dev_err(&etdev->pdev->dev,
- "NICReturnRFD illegal Buffer Index returned\n");
- }
-
- /* The processing on this RFD is done, so put it back on the tail of
- * our list
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&etdev->rcv_lock, flags);
- list_add_tail(&rfd->list_node, &rx_local->RecvList);
- rx_local->nReadyRecv++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&etdev->rcv_lock, flags);
-
- WARN_ON(rx_local->nReadyRecv > rx_local->NumRfd);
-}
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-05 17:35 [PATCH 0/5] staging: et131x: checkpatch fixes Mark Einon
2011-06-05 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging: et131x: et1310_address_map.h " Mark Einon
2011-06-05 19:14 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-05 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging: et131x: et1310_rx.c " Mark Einon
2011-06-05 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-05 17:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging: et131x: et131x_adapter.h " Mark Einon
2011-06-05 19:11 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-05 17:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: et131x: et131x_initpci.c " Mark Einon
2011-06-05 19:09 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-06 6:00 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-06-05 17:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging: et131x: et131x_netdev.c " Mark Einon
2011-06-05 19:10 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-05 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] staging: et131x: " Alan Cox
2011-06-06 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] staging: et131x: checkpatch fixes for et1310_address_map.h (All 'do not add new typedefs') Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:06 ` Mark Einon [this message]
2011-06-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] staging: et131x: et131x_adapter.h checkpatch fixes Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] staging: et131x: et131x_initpci.c " Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] staging: et131x: et131x_netdev.c " Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] staging: et131x: Fixes multiple 'WARNING: do not add new typedefs' Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] staging: et131x: Removing '_t' from ce_stats_t struct Mark Einon
2011-06-06 18:31 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307383624-8740-3-git-send-email-mark.einon@gmail.com \
--to=mark.einon@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.hartmann@telovital.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.