Re: [PATCH] libxl: initialize domid to 0 in libxl__create_stubdom

[Wei Liu <liuw@liuw.name>]

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 08:55 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:03 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The uninitialized domid may cause libxl__domain_make to fail.
> > 
> > In libxl__domain_make:
> > assert(!libxl_domid_valid_guest(*domid)).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuw@liuw.name>
> 
> That check seems pretty odd to me at first but the commit message of
> 22842:ccfa0527893e does a good job of explaining why so: 
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> 
> although it's not clear why libxl__domain_make doesn't just set an
> invalid value as it's first act and save the callers the effort, the net
> result would still be the correct semantics for libxl_domid_valid_guest
> when the function exits.
> 

I think the commit message of 22842:ccfa0527893e says pretty clear that
it is caller's responsibility to initialize domid to a invalid value.

However, libxl__make_domain sets domid=-1 a few lines after the check.
This confuses me.

> Ian.
>