From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: enabling upstream qemu as pure pv backend. Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:47:18 +0800 Message-ID: <1307616438.31235.67.camel@limbo> References: <1307503152.31359.2.camel@limbo> <1307536033.775.732.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1307538807.775.737.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1307541074.775.739.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1307548380.775.744.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1307603224.31235.8.camel@limbo> <1307609530.775.776.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1307612957.31235.53.camel@limbo> <1307614529.775.804.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1307614529.775.804.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:15 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Well, the configuration of the DM you are creating has everything to do > with the configuration of the domains it serves. > Ah, what I mean is that in current design, everything needed to create a DM is stored in dm_info, so we don't have to tangle with domain_config. I would rather leave those interfaces unchanged by now. > The DM in a stubdom still has another qmeu process in dom0. I guess > logically you can think of them as two parts of the same DM, which I > guess is what you are doing? > Yes, I understand. That's why I'm talking about one DM, not two. > It looks as if libxl__write_dmargs derives the stubdom parameters from > the dom0 process parameters (by filtering out uninteresting options) and > writes them to xenstore. > Hmm... That's it. The xenpv qemu and xenfv qemu in stubdom are sharing the same configuration variable. Wei.