From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] allarch.bbclass: Set FEED_ARCH to original value of BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH and then set BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH to 'all'
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:33:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308130405.15712.369.camel@rex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DCECC705-8B71-44A7-B1B6-1BE79A1FCADD@dominion.thruhere.net>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:56 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 14 jun 2011, om 23:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 14:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/classes/allarch.bbclass | 5 +++--
> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> >> index e3ac392..b9ba28b 100644
> >> --- a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> >> +++ b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass
> >> @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
> >> # This class is used for architecture independent recipes/data files (usally scripts)
> >> #
> >>
> >> +# We need to pour the value of BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH into FEED_ARCH
> >> +# before we reset it
> >> +FEED_ARCH := ${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH}
> >> BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"
> >> -PACKAGE_ARCH = "all"
> >> -
> >> # No need for virtual/libc or a cross compiler
> >> INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
> >
> > This is a *really* bad idea. An "all" package should have no need to set
> > architecture specific values into FEED_ARCH.
> >
> > Just for those not following IRC, the problem is Angstrom adds FEED_ARCH
> > to OVERRIDES. Adding "all" to overrides turns out to do nasty things to
> > classes like rm_work with "_all" in the function names.
>
> So I did the following in angstrom.inc:
>
> # Add FEED_ARCH and SOC_FAMILY to machine overrides so we get access to e.g. 'armv7a' and 'omap3'
> # Hopefully we'll never see a machine or arch with 'all' as substring
> MACHINEOVERRIDES .= ":${@bb.data.getVar('FEED_ARCH', d,1).replace('all','noarch')}:${SOC_FAMILY}"
>
> That makes parsing work for MACHINE=crownbay again, but:
>
> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded$ MACHINE=crownbay bitbake foo
> NOTE: Out of date cache found, rebuilding...
> NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support gconf-dbus because gconf-dbus has been merged back into main GConf | ETA: 00:03:09
> NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support gconf-dbus-native because gconf-dbus has been merged back into main GConf
> NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support libiconv because the eglibc provided iconv library is used############################## | ETA: 00:00:44
> NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support libiconv because the eglibc provided iconv library is used############################################################# | ETA: 00:00:24
> Parsing recipes: 100% |####################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 00:01:52
> Parsing of 1287 .bb files complete (0 cached, 1287 parsed). 1655 targets, 60 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 235, in _run_finalizers
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 235, in _run_finalizers
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 235, in _run_finalizers
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 235, in _run_finalizers
> finalizer()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 174, in __call__
> res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/codeparser.py", line 91, in parser_cache_save
> finalizer()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 174, in __call__
> res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/codeparser.py", line 91, in parser_cache_save
> finalizer()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 174, in __call__
> res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/codeparser.py", line 91, in parser_cache_save
> finalizer()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/util.py", line 174, in __call__
> res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/codeparser.py", line 91, in parser_cache_save
> data, version = p.load()
> ValueError: could not convert string to int
> data, version = p.load()
> ValueError: could not convert string to int
> data, version = p.load()
> data, version = p.load()
> ValueError: could not convert string to int
> ValueError: could not convert string to int
> ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", line 99, in runAsyncCommand
> self.cooker.updateCache()
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py", line 937, in updateCache
> if not self.parser.parse_next():
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py", line 1247, in parse_next
> self.shutdown()
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py", line 1236, in shutdown
> bb.codeparser.parser_cache_savemerge(self.cooker.configuration.data)
> File "/OE/tentacle/sources/bitbake/lib/bb/codeparser.py", line 121, in parser_cache_savemerge
> data, version = p.load()
> ValueError: could not convert string to int
>
> And the same happens for every machine now. So where did I misconvert an int to string?!?!?
Wiping out the code parser cache would fix this. I also pushed a fix for
it to bitbake master.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 21:13 [PATCH V2] allarch.bbclass: Set FEED_ARCH to original value of BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH and then set BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH to 'all' Khem Raj
2011-06-14 21:18 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-14 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-14 21:32 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-14 21:39 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-14 21:32 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-14 21:40 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-14 21:44 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-14 23:12 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-15 7:00 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 10:16 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-15 10:18 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 10:23 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-15 15:28 ` Khem Raj
2011-06-15 10:07 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-15 10:15 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 10:22 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-15 10:37 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 11:36 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-15 11:52 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 15:29 ` Mark Hatle
2011-06-15 8:56 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-15 9:33 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308130405.15712.369.camel@rex \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.