From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi124@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:23:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308169421.14175.19.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinMDz-sqaX0cyWEoLXt70dowxofvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:13 +0100, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2011 06:53 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> - Fast QCOW2 image read-write support beating Qemu in fio benchmarks. See
> >>> the
> >>> following URL for test result details: https://gist.github.com/1026888
> >>
> >> This is surprising. How is qemu invoked?
> >
> > Prasad will have the details. Please note that the above are with Qemu
> > defaults which doesn't use virtio. The results with virtio are little
> > better but still in favor of tools/kvm.
> >
>
> The qcow2 image used for testing was copied on to /dev/shm to avoid
> the disk delays in performance measurement.
>
> QEMU was invoked with following parameters
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -hda <disk image on hard disk> -hdb
> /dev/shm/test.qcow2 -m 1024M
>
Prasad, Could you please run this test with '-drive
file=/dev/shm/test.qcow2,if=virtio' instead of the '-hdb' thing?
> FIO job file used for measuring the numbers was
>
> prasad@prasad-vm:~$ cat fio-mixed.job
> ; fio-mixed.job for autotest
>
> [global]
> name=fio-sync
> directory=/mnt
> rw=randrw
> rwmixread=67
> rwmixwrite=33
> bsrange=16K-256K
> direct=0
> end_fsync=1
> verify=crc32
> ;ioscheduler=x
> numjobs=4
>
> [file1]
> size=50M
> ioengine=sync
> mem=malloc
>
> [file2]
> stonewall
> size=50M
> ioengine=aio
> mem=shm
> iodepth=4
>
> [file3]
> stonewall
> size=50M
> ioengine=mmap
> mem=mmap
> direct=1
>
> [file4]
> stonewall
> size=50M
> ioengine=splice
> mem=malloc
> direct=1
>
> - The test generates 16 file each of ~50MB, so in total ~800MB data was written.
> - The test.qcow2 was newly created before it was used with QEMU or KVM tool
> - The size of the QCOW2 image was 1.5GB.
> - The host machine had 2GB RAM.
> - The guest machine in both the cases was started with 1GB memory.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prasad
>
> >> btw the dump above is a little hard to interpret.
> >
> > It's what fio reports. The relevant bits are:
> >
> >
> > Qemu:
> >
> > Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=61152KB/s, minb=15655KB/s, maxb=17845KB/s,
> > mint=2938msec, maxt=3349msec
> > WRITE: io=68544KB, aggrb=28045KB/s, minb=6831KB/s, maxb=7858KB/s,
> > mint=2292msec, maxt=2444msec
> >
> > Run status group 1 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=61779KB/s, minb=15815KB/s, maxb=17189KB/s,
> > mint=3050msec, maxt=3315msec
> > WRITE: io=66576KB, aggrb=24165KB/s, minb=6205KB/s, maxb=7166KB/s,
> > mint=2485msec, maxt=2755msec
> >
> > Run status group 2 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=6722KB/s, minb=1720KB/s, maxb=1737KB/s,
> > mint=30178msec, maxt=30467msec
> > WRITE: io=65424KB, aggrb=2156KB/s, minb=550KB/s, maxb=573KB/s,
> > mint=29682msec, maxt=30342msec
> >
> > Run status group 3 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=6994KB/s, minb=1790KB/s, maxb=1834KB/s,
> > mint=28574msec, maxt=29279msec
> > WRITE: io=68192KB, aggrb=2382KB/s, minb=548KB/s, maxb=740KB/s,
> > mint=27121msec, maxt=28625msec
> >
> > Disk stats (read/write):
> > sdb: ios=60583/6652, merge=0/164, ticks=156340/672030,
> > in_queue=828230, util=82.71%
> >
> > tools/kvm:
> >
> > Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=149162KB/s, minb=38185KB/s,
> > maxb=46030KB/s, mint=1139msec, maxt=1373msec
> > WRITE: io=70528KB, aggrb=79156KB/s, minb=18903KB/s, maxb=23726KB/s,
> > mint=804msec, maxt=891msec
> >
> > Run status group 1 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=188235KB/s, minb=48188KB/s,
> > maxb=57932KB/s, mint=905msec, maxt=1088msec
> > WRITE: io=64464KB, aggrb=84821KB/s, minb=21751KB/s, maxb=27392KB/s,
> > mint=570msec, maxt=760msec
> >
> > Run status group 2 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=20005KB/s, minb=5121KB/s, maxb=5333KB/s,
> > mint=9830msec, maxt=10237msec
> > WRITE: io=66624KB, aggrb=6615KB/s, minb=1671KB/s, maxb=1781KB/s,
> > mint=9558msec, maxt=10071msec
> >
> > Run status group 3 (all jobs):
> > READ: io=204800KB, aggrb=66149KB/s, minb=16934KB/s, maxb=17936KB/s,
> > mint=2923msec, maxt=3096msec
> > WRITE: io=69600KB, aggrb=26717KB/s, minb=6595KB/s, maxb=7342KB/s,
> > mint=2530msec, maxt=2605msec
> >
> > Disk stats (read/write):
> > vdb: ios=61002/6654, merge=0/183, ticks=27270/205780,
> > in_queue=232220, util=69.46%
> >
--
Sasha.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 15:53 [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2 Pekka Enberg
2011-06-15 16:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-15 17:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-15 20:13 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-06-15 20:23 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2011-06-15 20:49 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-06-15 21:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-15 22:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-15 22:07 ` Alexander Graf
2011-06-15 22:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-15 22:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-16 5:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 6:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 9:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 9:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 9:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 10:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 11:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-17 7:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-06-16 5:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 7:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 9:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-16 5:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-16 5:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-15 21:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-16 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-16 15:01 ` Asias He
2011-06-19 8:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-16 14:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-06-16 22:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-17 1:03 ` Sasha Levin
2011-06-17 5:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-17 13:41 ` Sasha Levin
2011-06-17 13:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-17 5:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-17 7:31 ` justin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308169421.14175.19.camel@lappy \
--to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.