From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] drivers: introduce rpmsg, a remote-processor messaging bus Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:11:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1308712287.11435.4.camel@lappy> References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-8-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <87liwu8u3q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87liwu8u3q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Brian Swetland , Arnd Bergmann , Grant Likely , davinci-linux-open-source List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:12 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > +#define VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG 10 /* virtio remote processor messaging */ > > I think you want 6. Plan 9 jumped ahead to grab 9 :) Maybe it's worth adding an appendix to the virtio spec as part of this (and really any) patch series which takes a virtio ID. Also, I understand that virtio itself as an idea isn't Linux specific, but maybe it's worth including the spec (or at least a variation of it) as part of the kernel documentation. -- Sasha. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: levinsasha928@gmail.com (Sasha Levin) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:11:27 -0400 Subject: [RFC 7/8] drivers: introduce rpmsg, a remote-processor messaging bus In-Reply-To: <87liwu8u3q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-8-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <87liwu8u3q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: <1308712287.11435.4.camel@lappy> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:12 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > +#define VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG 10 /* virtio remote processor messaging */ > > I think you want 6. Plan 9 jumped ahead to grab 9 :) Maybe it's worth adding an appendix to the virtio spec as part of this (and really any) patch series which takes a virtio ID. Also, I understand that virtio itself as an idea isn't Linux specific, but maybe it's worth including the spec (or at least a variation of it) as part of the kernel documentation. -- Sasha.