From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (mtd + of) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:26:06 +0300 Message-ID: <1308947172.13493.37.camel@koala> References: <20110624155822.cb8cf6eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110624090456.191f1fda.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:49920 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751403Ab1FXU0Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:26:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110624090456.191f1fda.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:04 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:58:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >=20 > > Hi all, > >=20 > > Changes since 20110623: > >=20 > > My fixes tree includes: > > (as an experiment) the early part of mmotm-2011-06-22-13-05 > > STAGING: Comedi: Build only on arches providing PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACH= E >=20 >=20 > When CONFIG_MTD=3Dm, CONFIG_MTD_OF_PARTS=3Dy: >=20 > drivers/mtd/ofpart.o: In function `init_module': > ofpart.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module' > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.o:(.init.text+0x43): first defined here I guess this is some old issue? I do not think ofpart can be compiled-i= n if the mtd core is a module... --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QaCxG-0002Rb-PP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:26:19 +0000 Received: by bwf12 with SMTP id 12so256748bwf.36 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (mtd + of) From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Randy Dunlap Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:26:06 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20110624090456.191f1fda.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20110624155822.cb8cf6eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110624090456.191f1fda.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <1308947172.13493.37.camel@koala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , LKML , Grant Likely , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:04 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:58:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20110623: > > > > My fixes tree includes: > > (as an experiment) the early part of mmotm-2011-06-22-13-05 > > STAGING: Comedi: Build only on arches providing PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE > > > When CONFIG_MTD=m, CONFIG_MTD_OF_PARTS=y: > > drivers/mtd/ofpart.o: In function `init_module': > ofpart.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module' > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.o:(.init.text+0x43): first defined here I guess this is some old issue? I do not think ofpart can be compiled-in if the mtd core is a module... -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)