From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: hangcheck timeout for debugfs Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1309077486_23958@CP5-2952> References: <1308869354-3145-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <20110624154653.GD21246@snipes.kumite> <20110626002011.GD9413@snipes.kumite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (server109-228-6-236.live-servers.net [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56079E75F for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:38:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110626002011.GD9413@snipes.kumite> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:20:11 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > If you feel strongly about a module parameter being the better solution, > I will code it up. The more I think about about it, the more opposed I am to putting parameters in debugfs, or more correctly being caught putting them there. ;-) So please give the check for extinction of the timer in hangcheck a whirl. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre