From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/2] x86 SMP: enables core-pair topology detection for AMD CPUs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:51:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309251090.30420.4388.camel@elijah> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E08BD2D.9020403@amd.com>
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:26 +0100, Wei Huang wrote:
> Thanks, Jan and George. I attach the latest version which fixes the
> indentation issues.
Assuming the patch has the same effect on the scheduling, my previous
ack-effects-on-the-schedulers stands:
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>
> -Wei
>
>
> On 06/27/2011 03:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 24.06.11 at 00:51, Wei Huang<wei.huang2@amd.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The following two patches enable core-pair topology detection for AMD
> >> CPUs. The main idea is to record compute unit information into
> >> cpuinfo_x86 and use it when building sibling map. The sibling map will
> >> be used by Xen credit scheduler to coordinate VCPU scheduling in a
> >> fashion similar to SMT. This code is very similar to upstream Linux kernel.
> >>
> >> Regarding the performance improvement, I saw ~8% improvement running
> >> kernel compilation on Dom0 with this patch. Anrea Przywara ran a POVRay
> >> benchmark using this patch and he saw ~5% improvement. No perf
> >> degradation was seen so far.
> >>
> >> Please review.
> > Apart from some indentation issues these look fine to me.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Wei
> >
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-23 22:51 [PATCH][RFC][0/2] x86 SMP: enables core-pair topology detection for AMD CPUs Wei Huang
2011-06-27 8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2011-06-27 17:26 ` Wei Huang
2011-06-28 7:38 ` Jan Beulich
2011-06-28 8:51 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2011-10-21 10:31 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309251090.30420.4388.camel@elijah \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.