From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaHX-0005QP-5l for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:03 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaDw-00029v-Vs for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:41:21 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-core Organization: Phil Blundell Consulting Ltd Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:41:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1309513280.2633.28.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Subject: PRIORITY X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:45:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes? p.