From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24EFC33C9E for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 01:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C0524658 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 01:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="R7iSz2K1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47C0524658 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789B217AA; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:41:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 789B217AA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1579052550; bh=JX98q9zWc/mxkeau6HRn8GKgauRVjKLODFdOHG8fjV4=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=R7iSz2K13zAcA9qqtPqH++VAU+fP/Zqj1JW/P0X7OLcYF/i9xW81BBrCh+QVITIkW XYE4Hmy0V9XyrXV9vCevZoObhrtBHFWTz7sO4VvpnEIUhJUHE2geYr3lywOxgHI/1h PiBKBblVhBNquCljyHirxe318xjiWIKSMIUNYzHo= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD105F8014D; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:41:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 64303F8014E; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:41:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 372AAF80121 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:41:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 372AAF80121 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2020 17:41:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,320,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="305339471" Received: from sbreyer-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.228.18]) ([10.255.228.18]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2020 17:41:27 -0800 To: Kuninori Morimoto , ojab // References: <87h80x8t41.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <130af222-1086-ebcf-6a0f-9a390f9afbc3@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:41:27 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h80x8t41.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] No sound since 5.4 on skl_n88l25_s4567 X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" >>> Please take a look, I want my sound back ._. >> >> Forgot to mention, it's reproducible on linux master git. > > Hmm... > This patch > 1) removes unneeded if check > 2) adds missing error check. > > 1) shouldn't have effect to your PC. > Thus, maybe your PC failed by 2). > It had been worked by accident before ? > I guess your kernel is telling some message like this ? > > ASoC: no dapm match for %s --> %s --> %s It's likely that the topology file does not contain all the widgets/dais required by the hard-coded routes the machine driver, and by becoming stricter warnings became errors which in turn prevent the card from being created. It may be that we have to define a backwards compatible behavior that's enabled only for Intel legacy cases. Please post the results of alsa-info.sh somewhere so that we can take a look. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel