From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] memblock: Separate out memblock_find_in_range_node()
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:46:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310460395-30913-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310460395-30913-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Node affine memblock allocation logic is currently implemented across
memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_nid_region(). This
reorganizes it such that it resembles that of non-NUMA allocation API.
Area finding is collected and moved into new exported function
memblock_find_in_range_node() which is symmetrical to non-NUMA
counterpart - it handles @start/@end and understands ANYWHERE and
ACCESSIBLE. memblock_alloc_nid() now simply calls
memblock_find_in_range_node() and reserves the returned area.
This makes memblock_alloc[_try]_nid() observe ACCESSIBLE limit on node
affine allocations too (again, this doesn't make any difference for
the current sole user - sparc64).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 +++
mm/memblock.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 329ffb2..7400d02 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ extern long memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
/* The numa aware allocator is only available if
* CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP is set
*/
+extern phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
+ phys_addr_t end,
+ phys_addr_t size,
+ phys_addr_t align, int nid);
extern phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
int nid);
extern phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 447cf64..a8edb42 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -521,49 +521,56 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_nid_range_rev(phys_addr_t start,
return start;
}
-static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
+phys_addr_t __init memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
+ phys_addr_t end,
phys_addr_t size,
phys_addr_t align, int nid)
{
- phys_addr_t start, end;
+ struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory;
+ int i;
- start = mp->base;
- end = start + mp->size;
+ BUG_ON(0 == size);
- while (start < end) {
- phys_addr_t this_start;
- int this_nid;
+ /* Pump up max_addr */
+ if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
+ end = memblock.current_limit;
- this_start = memblock_nid_range_rev(start, end, &this_nid);
- if (this_nid == nid) {
- phys_addr_t ret = memblock_find_region(this_start, end, size, align);
- if (ret &&
- !memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, ret, size))
- return ret;
+ for (i = mem->cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ struct memblock_region *r = &mem->regions[i];
+ phys_addr_t base = max(start, r->base);
+ phys_addr_t top = min(end, r->base + r->size);
+
+ while (base < top) {
+ phys_addr_t tbase, ret;
+ int tnid;
+
+ tbase = memblock_nid_range_rev(base, top, &tnid);
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || tnid == nid) {
+ ret = memblock_find_region(tbase, top, size, align);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ top = tbase;
}
- end = this_start;
}
+
return 0;
}
phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
{
- struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory;
- int i;
-
- BUG_ON(0 == size);
+ phys_addr_t found;
- /* We align the size to limit fragmentation. Without this, a lot of
+ /*
+ * We align the size to limit fragmentation. Without this, a lot of
* small allocs quickly eat up the whole reserve array on sparc
*/
size = round_up(size, align);
- for (i = mem->cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- phys_addr_t ret = memblock_alloc_nid_region(&mem->regions[i],
- size, align, nid);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE,
+ size, align, nid);
+ if (found && !memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, found, size))
+ return found;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-12 8:46 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Implement for_each_mem_pfn_range() and use it to improve memblock allocator Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/8] bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with for_each_mem_pfn_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 2:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 7:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 7:46 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:27 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] bootmem: Reimplement __absent_pages_in_range() using for_each_mem_pfn_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:28 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] bootmem: Use for_each_mem_pfn_range() in page_alloc.c Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:28 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] memblock: Improve generic memblock_nid_range() using for_each_mem_pfn_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:29 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] memblock: Don't allow archs to override memblock_nid_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:29 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] memblock: Make memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() top-down Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:30 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-14 21:30 ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Separate out memblock_find_in_range_node() tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 8:46 ` [PATCH 8/8] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() with generic memblock calls Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:31 ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310460395-30913-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.