From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227C34C801FA for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:28:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6E9SD2Q006560; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:28:13 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05724-06; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:28:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6E9S5ie006550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:28:06 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Darren Hart In-Reply-To: <4E1E627B.80801@linux.intel.com> References: <1310597317.2270.4.camel@scimitar> <4E1E627B.80801@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:28:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1310635682.20015.1124.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: docs: how to spell "bitbake", and docbook semantic markup for user input X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:28:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and > >> a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling > >> "Bitbake" or "BitBake" since the doc source seems to bounce back and > >> forth and it really should be consistent. > > > > I believe it's the latter, at least that's what I've always use. > > > > Agreed: > > The man page: > BitBake - simple tool for the execution of tasks > > The user manual: > BitBake User Manual > > Those seem like the two lines of documentation that are most likely to > be correct :-) So unless Richard or Chris pipe up, I'd go with BitBake. I think we've been leaning towards BitBake for a while. Cheers, Richard