From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8922E4C80205 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:36:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2011 06:36:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,535,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="30723391" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.50]) ([10.255.14.50]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2011 06:36:48 -0700 From: Tom Zanussi To: Richard Purdie In-Reply-To: <1310736210.20015.1225.camel@rex> References: <1310736210.20015.1225.camel@rex> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:36:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1310736999.19790.45.camel@elmorro> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] meta-intel: add a couple common .inc files X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:36:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 06:23 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:55 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > The meta-intel BSPs currently have a number of machine settings common > > to all - factor these out into a couple common include files. > > For reference common include files are usually placed in > conf/machine/include/. If that happens they also need non-generic > suitably namespaced names, likely including "x86" or "ia32" in this > case. > > The benefit is you can then refer to one of these includes from another > layer. > > It also means you can refer to them as: > > include conf/machine/includes/xxx > > in other conf files removing some of the potential path issues. > > I do like the cleanup this gives though, this is just a detail! :) > Yeah, I wasn't sure all that would be welcome in there. ;-) I'll respin it that way and resubmit... Thanks for the input, Tom > Cheers, > > Richard >