All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Neela Syam Kolli <megaraidlinux@lsi.com>
Cc: 632187@bugs.debian.org, operator@ins.uni-bonn.de,
	Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: megaraid vs i2o for PCI device ID 101e:1960
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:29:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310740196.8783.288.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1EB3E8.1090503@ins.uni-bonn.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 930 bytes --]

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 11:16 +0200, Alexander Schier wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 09:19 AM, Alexander Schier wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 07/13/2011 06:29 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> Can you try adding 'blacklist=i2o_core' to the kernel parameters, so
> >> only the megaraid driver is used?
> > We will try this.
> Now it works, when i2o_core is blacklisted.

Alexander reported in <http://bugs.debian.org/632187> that the kernel
took a very long time to boot, and the log showed first i2o_core and
then megaraid failing to probe a device (ID 101e:1960).  But above he
reports that megaraid is able to probe it successfully if i2o_core
didn't break it first.

Should this device be blacklisted from i2o_core?  Are there likely other
MegaRAID devices that use the I2O PCI class but don't work with this
generic driver?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2011-07-15 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4E0C5B57.2020104@ins.uni-bonn.de>
     [not found] ` <handler.632187.B.130943320529363.ack@bugs.debian.org>
     [not found]   ` <4E0D8BAE.1000004@ins.uni-bonn.de>
     [not found]     ` <1310531358.8783.249.camel@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <4E1E989A.2090307@ins.uni-bonn.de>
     [not found]         ` <4E1EB3E8.1090503@ins.uni-bonn.de>
2011-07-15 14:29           ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-07-15 14:48             ` megaraid vs i2o for PCI device ID 101e:1960 Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1310740196.8783.288.camel@localhost \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=632187@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=megaraidlinux@lsi.com \
    --cc=operator@ins.uni-bonn.de \
    --cc=vvs@sw.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.