From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add error check to hex2bin().
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:52:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311072766.3258.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdTiMtmXdVSMq=6bAH2+rmSBHPPE9hQOLQN+Y3qPBEVFg@mail.gmail.com>
(sorry for re-posting, but this doesn't seem to have made it to the
lists.)
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 00:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > What about making it return the number of unprocessed bytes left instead?
> > Then the caller knows where the problem lies. And zero would mean success.
> If I remember correctly it used to be src as return value in some
> version of that patch. I don't know the details of that interim
> solution. My current opinion is to return boolean and make an
> additional parameter to return src value. However, it could make this
> simple function fat.
> P.S. Take into account that the user of it is only one so far, I would
> like to hear a Mimi's opinion.
>
Trusted/encrypted keys are not in a critical code path. They're used for
loading/storing key blobs from userspace. From a trusted/encrypted key
perspective, it doesn't make much of a difference.
thanks,
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 8:26 [PATCH] net: can: remove custom hex_to_bin() Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 11:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-07-18 12:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 12:48 ` [PATCH] Add error check to hex2bin() Tetsuo Handa
2011-07-18 18:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2011-07-18 18:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 19:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2011-07-18 19:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 19:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 21:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2011-07-18 20:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-07-18 20:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-07-18 21:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2011-07-18 21:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2011-07-19 1:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2011-07-19 10:52 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2011-07-18 14:02 ` [PATCH] net: can: remove custom hex_to_bin() Oliver Hartkopp
2011-07-18 18:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311072766.3258.8.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.