From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ibm_newemac: Don't start autonegotiation when disabled in BMCR (genmii)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:29:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311078570.25044.421.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107191359.57421.sr@denx.de>
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:59 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011 13:35:22 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:50 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > As noticed on a custom 440GX board using the Micrel KSZ8041 PHY in
> > > fiber mode, a strapped fixed PHY configuration will currently restart
> > > the autonegotiation. This patch checks the BMCR_ANENABLE bit and
> > > skips this autonegotiation if its disabled.
> >
> > Won't that just break aneg on everything else ?
> >
> > IE, most other PHYs rely on ANENABLE being set further down this same
> > function (especially if the FW doesn't do it but even then, we may reset
> > PHYs along the way etc...)
>
> If aneg is enabled for a PHY (e.g. not strapped to fixed configuration), I
> don't see how this patch will change the current aneg behaviour. Perhaps I'm
> missing something, but I tested this on some boards with aneg enabled (Sequoia
> etc). And I didn't notice any problems.
But is aneg always enabled via straps ? The whole point of this function
is that aneg can be enabled or disabled via the ethtool API (thus
overriding whatever strapping)... I may be missing something but this
patch looks like it would break this no ?
> > This is something that really a case where the device-tree should
> > indicate that aneg shall not be performed and from there don't call
> > setup_aneg at all.
>
> I feel that this BMCR_ANENABLE bit should be evaluated, but I have no strong
> preference here. If you prefer that this should be handled via a new dt
> property (phy-aneg = "disabled" ?), I can implement it this way. Just let me
> know.
Don't we already have some bindings for PHY with a fixed setting ? I
don't remember off hand, we need to dbl check.
I don't like looking at BMCR because BCMR is a -control- register,
something that we can (and will) whack with anything ourselves, which
can be reset or reconfigured and I have learned to never trust board
straps :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 10:50 [PATCH] net: ibm_newemac: Don't start autonegotiation when disabled in BMCR (genmii) Stefan Roese
2011-07-19 11:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19 11:59 ` Stefan Roese
2011-07-19 12:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-07-20 7:18 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311078570.25044.421.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.