From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QjJvo-0003qn-SP for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:42:29 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2011 16:35:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,231,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="29178481" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.85]) ([10.255.14.85]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2011 16:35:12 -0700 From: Joshua Lock To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:35:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <201107200038.55362.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> References: <201107182310.56104.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201107182319.01358.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201107200038.55362.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 (3.0.2-3.fc15) Message-ID: <1311118512.2115.15.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [OE-core][meta-oe] Problems on downloading sources (was [OE-core] Problems downloading xfwm4 4.8.1) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:42:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 00:38 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2011 11:19:01 PM Andreas Mueller wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2011 11:10:55 PM you wrote: > > > Ciao > > > > > > currently I am porting my local oe recipes for xfce-4.8 to oe-core. > > > Everything seems fine so far - except xfwm4. This one drives me totally > > > insane: If you check the fetch log attched and copy the first url into a > > > browser it starts downloading without problems but oe complains. > > > > > > Could somebody please point me onto what is going wrong - if you need > > > further information I'll send... > > > > I found a hook on what is going wrong - forget my prevoius mail - sorry fo > > the noise.. > Sorry but my 'hook' was some late night crap. > > I attached what I did up to now. It is meta-xfce which should live in meta- > openembedded. I checked on fresh tmp and without downloaded sources. For (at > least) xfwm4 and xfce4-appfinder build fails when downloading sources. For xfce4- > appfinder I get: > > ERROR: Function 'Fetcher failure for URL: > 'http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4- > appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2'. Unable to fetch URL > http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4-appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2 > from any source.' failed > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core- > eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/xfce4-appfinder-4.8.0- > r0/temp/log.do_fetch.30009 > Log data follows: > | NOTE: fetch http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4- > appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2 > | NOTE: fetch http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/unstable/sources/xfce4- > appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2 > | ERROR: Function 'Fetcher failure for URL: > 'http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4- > appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2'. Unable to fetch URL > http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4-appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2 > from any source.' failed > NOTE: package xfce4-appfinder-4.8.0-r0: task do_fetch: Failed > > If I enter http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/xfce4-appfinder/4.8/xfce4- > appfinder-4.8.0.tar.bz2 in my browser or perform wget manually, the source file is > downloaded properly!! > > Could somebody please spend some time with the attachment and tell me what's > going on here?? I'd guess it's Yocto #1256[1], namely that "fetcher reports a download failure when only the SRC_URI checksums mismatched" The idea is that the fetcher retries downloads a few times when the checksums do not match, unfortunately at the default log level this just looks like a fetch failure. Can you run bitbake with -DD and see if you can see a checksum error? Or just verify checksums by hand? Cheers, Joshua 1. http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre