diff for duplicates of <1311173910.5345.94.camel@twins> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index eef6726..77223d0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 07:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> So with that fix the patch makes the machine happy again? > > > > Yes, the machine looks fine with the patches applied. Thanks! ->=20 +> > Ok, so what's the situation for 3.0 (I'm waiting for some RCU > resolution now)? Anton's patch may be small, but that's just the tiny > fixup patch to Peter's much scarier one ;) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d60ffc7..f17eba7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -15,11 +15,12 @@ "Subject\0Re: [regression] 3.0-rc boot failure -- bisected to cd4ea6ae3982\0" "Date\0Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:58:30 +0200\0" "To\0Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>\0" - "Cc\0mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com" + "Cc\0Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>" + mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> + linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org mingo@elte.hu - " linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org\0" + " benh@kernel.crashing.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 07:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:\n" @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ "> >> So with that fix the patch makes the machine happy again?\n" "> >\n" "> > Yes, the machine looks fine with the patches applied. Thanks!\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Ok, so what's the situation for 3.0 (I'm waiting for some RCU\n" "> resolution now)? Anton's patch may be small, but that's just the tiny\n" "> fixup patch to Peter's much scarier one ;)\n" @@ -42,4 +43,4 @@ "to have NODE sd_flags will now have ALL_NODE sd_flags which are much\n" less aggressive. -43692768228993cf519ed0fc42a46fb7c2ffaaa44d84056306d8935428c393b2 +aaa40116f3b1fdd4185a3087db9c8b4b5439e8ee41a876364305c332e925fad3
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.