From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Qjf4t-0008Um-HJ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:17:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjf4r-0008Ue-94 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:17:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjf4p-0002H8-MD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:17:13 -0400 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:54179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjf4p-0002H4-6a for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:17:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (213.65.186.64) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u84406617) id 4DEDBD7B00CC930C; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:17:09 +0200 Subject: Re: grub2 claims grub.cfg is out of partition From: Svante Signell To: Vladimir =?UTF-8?Q?=27=CF=86-coder/phcoder=27?= Serbinenko In-Reply-To: <4E27506F.6040702@gmail.com> References: <1311198605.2740.58.camel@x60> <4E27506F.6040702@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Hemma Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:17:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1311200227.2740.60.camel@x60> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 195.67.226.208 Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:17:14 -0000 On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 00:02 +0200, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbin= enko wrote: > On 20.07.2011 23:50, Svante Signell wrote: > > Have you seen this: Debian bug #634799. Seems to be a problem with Li= nux > > on kvm too. > > > Such bug forwarding requiring the potential bugfixer to search the > actual description somewhere lese is automatically ignored Sorry: Here is the link. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D634799