From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
To: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@ieee.org>
Cc: selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] last misc stuff
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 13:22:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13114899.BBxJTFboZp@xev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8e818b7-0cbb-8598-b9c9-4967c6af418f@ieee.org>
On Sunday, 6 January 2019 6:04:14 AM AEDT Chris PeBenito wrote:
> > Index: refpolicy-2.20180701/policy/modules/admin/apt.fc
> > ===================================================================
> > --- refpolicy-2.20180701.orig/policy/modules/admin/apt.fc
> > +++ refpolicy-2.20180701/policy/modules/admin/apt.fc
> > @@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
> > /etc/cron\.daily/apt --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0)
> >
> > -ifndef(`distro_redhat',`
> > +/usr/bin/apt --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) /usr/bin/apt-get --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) -/usr/bin/apt-shell
> > -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) /usr/bin/aptitude
> > -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0)
> > +/usr/sbin/update-apt-xapian-index --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) +
> > +ifndef(`distro_redhat',`
> > +/usr/bin/apt-shell --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) /usr/sbin/synaptic --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0)
> > /usr/lib/packagekit/packagekitd --
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_exec_t,s0) /var/cache/PackageKit(/.*)?
> > gen_context(system_u:object_r:apt_var_cache_t,s0)
> I modified some of these changes, as it results in file context
> conflicts with the RPM module. More accurately, I removed the fc
> entries in RPM that label the apt executables. I moved the apt-shell
> back out of the ifndef block.
>
> I think the synaptic and packagekit fc entries, which are in both apt
> and rpm modules, may need to be dropped and move to the distro's
> patches. Either that, or this ifndef needs to turn into ifdef debian
> (or something else).
>
> Otherwise merged.
I agree that things should be reconsidered with apt policy.
Do we even need separate apt and rpm policy given that both package managers
have access to write everything and change config files?
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-06 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-04 7:35 [PATCH] last misc stuff Russell Coker
2019-01-05 19:04 ` Chris PeBenito
2019-01-06 2:22 ` Russell Coker [this message]
2019-01-06 7:38 ` Dominick Grift
2019-01-06 18:22 ` Chris PeBenito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13114899.BBxJTFboZp@xev \
--to=russell@coker.com.au \
--cc=pebenito@ieee.org \
--cc=selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.