From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755528Ab1G2IVY (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:21:24 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:35684 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755046Ab1G2IVS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:21:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove WAKEUP_PREEMPT feature check in entity_tick From: Peter Zijlstra To: Yong Zhang Cc: Lin Ming , "mingo@elte.hu" , lkml , Mike Galbraith In-Reply-To: <20110729081800.GA12106@zhy> References: <1311846203.3938.1555.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <20110729062158.GA8971@zhy> <1311922180.3938.1573.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <20110729070356.GA10420@zhy> <1311924975.3938.1583.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <20110729074635.GB10420@zhy> <1311926218.5890.215.camel@twins> <20110729081800.GA12106@zhy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:20:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1311927650.5890.217.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:18 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > > Nah, if there is 1 runnable task it will always run, preemption simply > > doesn't matter. There's nothing to preempt it with. > > Hmmm, so the newly waked task could be scheduled a little later. > That means schedule tick judge everything. Oh, are you referring to the case where a task gets woken on an idle remote cpu?