From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Volkov Subject: net/netfilter/nf_nat.h header instalation Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:37:40 +0400 Message-ID: <1311932260.21981.11.camel@tablet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:45423 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755804Ab1G2Jif (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:38:35 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ap.ran.gpi.ru [195.209.218.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A37C91B401B for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. Could you suggest solution for following problem: miniupnpd [1] uses net/netfilter/nf_nat.h header and fails to build as normally this header is not installed by kernel during header. But is this correct? As I found, iptables itself copies this kernel headers and bundles together with sources for reasons outlined in [3]. Now for miniupnpd distributions started to install net/netfilter/*.h [4] [5]. I'm not opposed to install this headers in Gentoo too, bug if this is user space header shouldn't kernel install it? [1] http://miniupnp.free.fr/files [2] http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=771&start=15 [3] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/36623 [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541979 [5] https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=58007 -- Peter.