From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] update to cpupri algorithm Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1312225594.8151.91.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <20110729151340.419467771@goodmis.org> <1312017596.8752.78.camel@marge.simson.net> <1312208313.18583.28.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1312224095.8151.78.camel@marge.simson.net> <1312224871.18583.72.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , RT To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55292 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299Ab1HATGh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:06:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1312224871.18583.72.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 14:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 20:41 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Thanks for testing! I'll redo the patches to remove the logging, and > > > send them to you again. Could you return back a 'Tested-by' tag > > > afterward. > > > > (I did the logging removal, the posted numbers were that, but..) > > Could you merge the two patches and diff them against the one I posted > privately. Just to make sure that you really tested the one I plan on > giving to Mainline. Good idea, will do. -Mike