From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@cozybit.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mac80211: update mesh peering frame format
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:24:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312809868.4372.33.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311638357-28740-5-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> (sfid-20110726_020035_271179_DC9E109E)
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 16:59 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
> -#define PLINK_GET_LLID(p) (p + 4)
> -#define PLINK_GET_PLID(p) (p + 6)
> +#define PLINK_GET_LLID(p) (p + 2)
> +#define PLINK_GET_PLID(p) (p + 4)
This is a more tangential comment -- but I'd feel more comfortable with
the code if these macros were removed and some structs overlaid the IEs
instead. But definitely not as part of this patch -- hence tangential.
> + case WLAN_CATEGORY_SELF_PROTECTED:
> + switch (mgmt->u.action.u.self_prot.action_code) {
> + case WLAN_SP_MESH_PEERING_OPEN:
> + case WLAN_SP_MESH_PEERING_CLOSE:
> + case WLAN_SP_MESH_PEERING_CONFIRM:
> + if (!ieee80211_vif_is_mesh(&sdata->vif))
> + goto invalid;
> + if (sdata->u.mesh.security != IEEE80211_MESH_SEC_NONE)
> + /* userspace handles this frame */
Will this compile in the CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH=n case? It seems like it
might not? Do you routinely test that?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-08 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 23:59 [PATCH 0/6] update mesh frame formats Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] mac80211: fix mesh beacon format Thomas Pedersen
2011-08-08 13:21 ` Johannes Berg
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] ieee80211: introduce Self Protected Action codes Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] mac80211: update mesh peering frame codes Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] mac80211: update mesh peering frame format Thomas Pedersen
2011-08-08 13:24 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-08-08 18:47 ` Thomas Pedersen
2011-08-08 19:10 ` Johannes Berg
2011-08-08 19:15 ` Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] ieee80211: add mesh action codes Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-25 23:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] mac80211: update mesh path selection frame format Thomas Pedersen
2011-07-29 0:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Pedersen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-09 19:50 [PATCH 0/6] mac80211: mesh frame formats Thomas Pedersen
2011-08-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] mac80211: update mesh peering frame format Thomas Pedersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312809868.4372.33.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=thomas@cozybit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.