From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald van Dijk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [SHELL] Allow building without LINEO support. Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1313561086.28006.6.camel@linux> References: <20110816.174502.2209127983953431973.davem@davemloft.net> <20110817011235.GA22867@elie.gateway.2wire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hosting12.csv-networks.nl ([84.244.151.141]:51612 "EHLO hosting12.csv-networks.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750813Ab1HQGIE (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:08:04 -0400 Received: from 541f32bc.cm-5-8a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.31.50.188] helo=[10.0.1.116]) by hosting12.csv-networks.nl with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1QtZEf-0002RZ-21 for dash@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:04:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20110817011235.GA22867@elie.gateway.2wire.net> Sender: dash-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dash@vger.kernel.org To: dash@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 20:12 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > David Miller wrote: > > > [Subject: [SHELL] Allow building without LINEO support.] > > Thanks! Debian has been using something like this (but unconditional) > to convince autoconf not to use dash as CONFIG_SHELL, to work around > bugs in various configure scripts[1]. I imagine other users might > want the same thing, so a patch like this seems like a good idea. If you don't mind me asking, if you want configure scripts to run from bash, why not simply run configure scripts from bash, instead of running them from sh and trusting that sh will call bash if it is really some other shell? Don't get me wrong, there are other reasons why making LINENO support optional is a good idea (smaller executable at the low cost of a rarely used feature), so don't take this as an argument against this patch, I'm just curious about this one point.