From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYl_QpxNkSvM for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from molly.corsac.net (molly.corsac.net [IPv6:2002:4ec0:442e::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from scapa.corsac.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:4ec0:442e:0:f2de:f1ff:fe19:1967]) by molly.corsac.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3668582CF5 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:49:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Yves-Alexis Perez In-Reply-To: <4E4CD3CF.5050803@redhat.com> References: <4E4AD6F2.8020800@archlinux.org> <4E4AE4DB.30205@redhat.com> <4E4AE740.9020800@archlinux.org> <4E4B6E61.4020301@redhat.com> <4E4BA46F.5010809@alexanderkoch.net> <1313577794.6534.12.camel@oban> <4E4B9C78.70504@redhat.com> <4E4BA673.9060000@redhat.com> <1313583460.6534.14.camel@oban> <4E4CD3CF.5050803@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-J9Cw9K9sVNvtdxxEikiM" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1313700573.17474.4.camel@scapa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] The weird bug again: semid XXXXXX: semop failed for cookie 0xdeadbeef: incorrect semaphore state List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de --=-J9Cw9K9sVNvtdxxEikiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On jeu., 2011-08-18 at 10:56 +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > >> Despite I like the idea of sandboxing I have to ask > >> why it is part of "browser" and not some separate package. > >> What's next? Bundled kernel? :) > >=20 > > Because each tab is sandboxed. There's a seccomp sandbox available too. >=20 > It doesn't mean it should install trillion of bundled libraries. > (Not that other browsers are much bettter...)=20 Though that's quite unrelated. But they intend to provide a seccomp sandbox library at one point, see http://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/ Regards, --=20 Yves-Alexis --=-J9Cw9K9sVNvtdxxEikiM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJOTXrZAAoJEDBVD3hx7wuoxSkP/A98vPJnkh0/8/3cNyQdSQ8v gFsNSa/sHLzIdZ1lmOpFAnA6QA6CpfW3GsItj5pGX730Hw7OwHy4Kht8vyliWMWs AKgFuweYLdAPHsbJftpkbQAAi58QnzNtjU6aGq41G5hT2l+QjQ4xL2X0ClMZ2CQz Jw/iovzBJwU5YD3cmMyZ1u0cFkTWrilUHgrim6IL/7grSIA1sx9uWO8XuE6bl2Iq C94tYisulvrkeM12H0gpipCL0CedJfasSJ4Z0b43gtK0kzHR2ZlwOD378x4Lgzgq my7wXJxkC0TIn6Icyh8WlS1qU8Qm7AiYxvZEJ9aAVaHAEp7A6Hvl6filKaD8tQB2 QNBnOxnEZ3LPIksDb4kf0Z/Dr+Uaw+YUFYafnxUFoflXSK6m9zUvEX0HS4rXnDeE dx1w31mtPl6E4Gd9gWoWtOmoQX14/dP4K2eM9VHXQh66qBPgbJhxA/mdjo4XB8B7 l69XSRZ2dPkQosS0oJobPs+Cx5kCGLRoT6kOwFFRjpKH2TqEyl05zrZHQRtDb989 sV4NV+qZ6MflP40cujTcYSJvXAqoM4LhI7zrlCm5v8CQ3Ug5Y9y7l2//kX96Tu3a I076Oz22naiZEvNRnTZik2honJlteD+g8MQbqsL1Hcq18Kt7nN8N7xU/8+kRxCok fLRsGPV70SOWjuiYb0/b =jsfv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-J9Cw9K9sVNvtdxxEikiM--