From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <4E662BD6.9080205@domain.hid> References: <4E63E503.8090206@domain.hid> <4E66049D.6000105@domain.hid> <1315315628.20820.48.camel@domain.hid> <4E662BD6.9080205@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:53:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1315320786.20820.53.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] Xenomai 2.6.0-rc1 List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Xenomai core On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:19 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 09/06/2011 03:27 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 13:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> On 09/04/2011 10:52 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The first release candidate for the 2.6.0 version may be downloaded here: > >>> > >>> http://download.gna.org/xenomai/testing/xenomai-2.6.0-rc1.tar.bz2 > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> currently 2.6.0-rc1 fails to build on 2.4 kernel, with errors related to > >> vfile support. Do we really want to still support 2.4 kernels? > >> > > > > That would not be a massive loss, but removing linux 2.4 support is more > > than a few hunks here and there, so this may not be the right thing to > > do ATM. Besides, it would be better not to leave the few linux 2.4 users > > out there without upgrade path to xenomai 2.6, since this will be the > > last maintained version from the Xenomai 2.x architecture. > > > > That stuff does not compile likely because the Config.in bits are not up > > to date, blame it on me. I'll make this build over linux 2.4 and commit > > the result today. > > > > No problem, I was not looking for someone to blame... Since you are at > it, I have problems compiling the nios2 kernel too, but I am not sure I > got the proper configuration file. > HEAD builds fine based on the attached .config. -- Philippe.